Labour lawProperty LawContract law

How a civil dispute is handled in the courts

By 26. June 2025 #!30Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:27:05 +0200+02:000530#30Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:27:05 +0200+02:00-9Europe/Oslo3030Europe/Oslo202630 26am30am-30Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:27:05 +0200+02:009Europe/Oslo3030Europe/Oslo2026302026Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:27:05 +0200279276amFriday=1125#!30Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:27:05 +0200+02:00Europe/Oslo6#June 26th, 2026#!30Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:27:05 +0200+02:000530#/30Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:27:05 +0200+02:00-9Europe/Oslo3030Europe/Oslo202630#!30Fri, 26 Jun 2026 09:27:05 +0200+02:00Europe/Oslo6# No Comments

For many private individuals and businesses, the threshold for bringing a dispute before the courts is high. At the same time, it is important to understand how the process actually works. A solid understanding of procedural steps can support better strategic decisions, increase predictability, and often also contribute to resolving the dispute earlier in the process.

What is a civil dispute?

A civil dispute is a disagreement between two or more parties concerning a legal claim. This may, for example, involve breach of contract, defects in a purchase, compensation claims, neighbour disputes, employment law issues, or other private law matters.

Civil cases differ from criminal cases in that they do not concern questions of criminal liability, but rather the determination of rights and obligations between the parties.

Does the case first have to go to the Conciliation Board?

In many financial disputes, the general rule is that the case must first be heard by the Conciliation Board before it can be brought before the District Court. The purpose is to facilitate a simple, fast, and cost-effective resolution through mediation or judgment. However, there are several exceptions to this rule, including larger cases where both parties are represented by a lawyer, or where the dispute has already been handled by an approved complaints or appeal board.

The Conciliation Board therefore often serves as the first stop on the way to a potential court case.

Initiating the case by statement of claim

If the dispute is not resolved, the case is brought before the District Court by the claimant submitting a statement of claim.

The statement of claim must include, among other things:

  • who the parties are
  • what claim is being made
  • what decision is requested
  • the factual and legal basis for the claim
  • what evidence will be presented

The statement of claim must be sufficiently specific for the opposing party to understand the claim and prepare its defence. If the formal requirements are not met, the case may be dismissed.

Defence from the opposing party

When the District Court receives a properly formulated statement of claim, it is sent to the defendant with a deadline for submitting a defence. The deadline is normally three weeks.

In the defence, the defendant must respond to the claim and state whether it is contested or accepted. If the defendant fails to respond within the deadline, the claimant may in some cases request a default judgment.

Case preparation

Many people believe that a court case is primarily about what happens in the courtroom. In practice, case preparation is often an equally important part of the process.

After the statement of claim and defence have been submitted, the court and the parties will establish a plan for further proceedings. Preparatory meetings may be held, where the following may be clarified:

  • what evidence will be presented
  • the need for expert witnesses
  • whether an inspection should be carried out
  • whether the case is suitable for court settlement negotiations (mediation)
  • how long the main hearing is expected to take

The parties must ensure that all relevant evidence and arguments are presented in time. The court places great emphasis on efficient and focused proceedings.

Court settlement (mediation) – an alternative to judgment

Before the case proceeds to the main hearing, the possibility of court settlement (mediation) is often considered.

Court mediation involves a judge or other mediator assisting the parties in trying to reach an amicable solution. Many cases are resolved at this stage, which can save the parties both time, costs, and uncertainty.

Although not all disputes are suitable for mediation, this is often a measure that should be seriously considered.

Small claims procedure or ordinary proceedings?

How the case is handled depends, among other things, on its value.

Disputes with a financial value below NOK 250,000 are generally processed under the rules for small claims procedure. The purpose is to provide a simpler, faster, and less costly process. Hearings are shorter, and there are limitations on which legal costs can be recovered.

For larger or more complex cases, ordinary proceedings under the rules of civil procedure apply. These cases typically involve more extensive preparation and a fuller main hearing.

What happens during the main hearing?

If the case is not resolved earlier, it is decided through a main hearing in court.

The main hearing is generally oral. Here, the parties have the opportunity to present their arguments, examine witnesses, and submit evidence. The court must ensure that the proceedings are conducted efficiently and properly.

A typical main hearing consists of:

  1. An introductory presentation of the case
  2. Opening statements by the parties
  3. Party statements
  4. Witness testimony and other evidence
  5. Closing arguments by counsel
  6. Conclusion of the case and submission of costs claims

The duration of the main hearing depends on the complexity of the case. Many disputes of moderate financial value are handled within a single court day, while larger cases may last several days or weeks.

Judgment and legal costs

When the main hearing has concluded, the court deliberates and decides the case.

In ordinary civil cases, judgment is generally delivered within two weeks after the case has been concluded. In small claims cases, this often happens even faster.

The winning party will, as a general rule, be entitled to recover necessary legal costs from the losing party. In small claims cases, special limitations apply to such claims.

Good case management leads to better outcomes

Although the courts are designed to ensure fair handling of disputes, significant demands are placed on the parties’ preparation and procedural management of the case.

A thorough assessment of the evidence, realistic expectations regarding the outcome, and continuous evaluation of settlement possibilities will often be decisive for a good result. Many disputes can also be resolved long before the main hearing if the parties receive qualified legal assistance early in the process.

Martin Edelsteen Woll

Martin Edelsteen Woll

Lawyer

mwoll@melo.no
+47 414 87 832

Are you facing a civil dispute?

Send us a non-binding inquiry

Contact form

"*" indicates required fields

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Name*