{"id":17663,"date":"2025-10-22T10:52:28","date_gmt":"2025-10-22T08:52:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/melo.no\/?p=17663"},"modified":"2025-10-22T10:53:07","modified_gmt":"2025-10-22T08:53:07","slug":"boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/","title":{"rendered":"Homebuyer had not lost the right to invoke defects"},"content":{"rendered":"
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div> <\/div>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\r\n
\r\n\t
\r\n\t\t

In the seller\u2019s disclosure form, two home sellers stated that there had previously been mice in the property and that certain work on the property had been carried out by unqualified persons. After taking possession, the buyers engaged an expert who discovered damage caused by mice as well as defects in the property\u2019s exterior cladding and garage walls.<\/p>\n

The buyers sought rescission of the purchase agreement. They succeeded before the District Court, but not before the Court of Appeal. Since the buyers had received information giving rise to concern, the Court of Appeal held that it was reasonable to require them either to investigate the property further or to make reservations when purchasing it.<\/p>\n

The Supreme Court held that there were no grounds for barring the buyers\u2019 defect claims on the basis that they had failed to investigate the property sufficiently. Although the buyers knew that there had been mice in the property and that unqualified work had been performed, they were not aware that these circumstances had resulted in actual damage. In the Supreme Court\u2019s view, such general risk-related information could not, in itself, trigger a duty to conduct special investigations, thereby transferring the risk of hidden defects to the buyer. Any other conclusion would create an opportunity to circumvent the allocation of risk intended by the Norwegian Parliament when it amended Section 3-9 of the Alienation Act (Avhendingslova) in 2022, removing the possibility of selling residential property to consumers on an \u201cas is\u201d basis. There were no visible signs of damage that the buyers should have discovered during the ordinary viewing of the property.<\/p>\n

The judgment of the Court of Appeal was therefore set aside. Upon rehearing, the Court of Appeal would have to reconsider the issue of rescission.<\/p>\n

The judgment provides guidance on the scope of the buyer\u2019s duty to investigate under Section 3-10 of the Alienation Act and on how that provision should be interpreted and applied following the 2022 legislative amendments.<\/p>\n

Source: Supreme Court<\/a><\/p>\n\t<\/div>\r\n<\/div>\r\n\r\n\r\n\r\n\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t

<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div> <\/div>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\"Martin

Martin Edelsteen Woll<\/h4>
Lawyer<\/div>

mwoll@melo.no
\n+47 414 87 832<\/p><\/div>\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t

<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t
<\/div><\/div>
<\/div><\/div>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t
\n\t\t\t\t
<\/div> <\/div>
\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t

Any questions regarding real estate law?<\/h2>
<\/div><\/div>Send us a non-binding inquiry<\/span><\/i><\/a>\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n\n\t
<\/div>\n\t\t
\n\t\t
\n\t\t\t\n\t\t<\/div> \n\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>\n\t\t\t<\/div> \n\t\t<\/div>\n\t<\/div> \n<\/div><\/div>","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"To boligselgere hadde i egenerkl\u00e6ringsskjema opplyst om at det tidligere hadde v\u00e6rt mus i boligen, og at det var gjort ufagl\u00e6rt arbeid p\u00e5 eiendommen. Etter overtakelse engasjerte kj\u00f8perne en sakkyndig,...","protected":false},"author":188,"featured_media":9715,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_analytify_skip_tracking":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[37],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-17663","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","category-fast-eiendom"],"yoast_head":"\nBoligkj\u00f8per hadde ikke mistet adgangen til \u00e5 p\u00e5berope mangler<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"H\u00f8yesterett kom til at det ikke var grunnlag for \u00e5 avskj\u00e6re mangelskrav av den grunn at kj\u00f8perne ikke hadde unders\u00f8kt boligen tilstrekkelig.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Atle Mel\u00f8\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Estimated reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"3 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Atle Mel\u00f8\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/351ddaec8ea5c2caca44f44a288d6693\"},\"headline\":\"Boligkj\u00f8per hadde ikke mistet adgangen til \u00e5 p\u00e5berope mangler\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-22T08:52:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-22T08:53:07+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":1038,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/05\\\/eiendom-tinglysing-kartverket-hjemmelshaver-grunnbokshjemmel-nyhet.jpg\",\"articleSection\":[\"Fast eiendom\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/\",\"name\":\"Boligkj\u00f8per hadde ikke mistet adgangen til \u00e5 p\u00e5berope mangler\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/05\\\/eiendom-tinglysing-kartverket-hjemmelshaver-grunnbokshjemmel-nyhet.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-10-22T08:52:28+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-10-22T08:53:07+00:00\",\"description\":\"H\u00f8yesterett kom til at det ikke var grunnlag for \u00e5 avskj\u00e6re mangelskrav av den grunn at kj\u00f8perne ikke hadde unders\u00f8kt boligen tilstrekkelig.\",\"breadcrumb\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/#breadcrumb\"},\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/05\\\/eiendom-tinglysing-kartverket-hjemmelshaver-grunnbokshjemmel-nyhet.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/05\\\/eiendom-tinglysing-kartverket-hjemmelshaver-grunnbokshjemmel-nyhet.jpg\",\"width\":1000,\"height\":667,\"caption\":\"Tinglysing av hjemmel\"},{\"@type\":\"BreadcrumbList\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\\\/#breadcrumb\",\"itemListElement\":[{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":1,\"name\":\"Hjem\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":2,\"name\":\"Fast eiendom\",\"item\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/fast-eiendom\\\/\"},{\"@type\":\"ListItem\",\"position\":3,\"name\":\"Boligkj\u00f8per hadde ikke mistet adgangen til \u00e5 p\u00e5berope mangler\"}]},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"Advokatfirmaet Mel\u00f8 AS\",\"description\":\"Advokat Trondheim\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"Advokatfirmaet Mel\u00f8 AS\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/Logo-Mel\u00f8-65.png\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2019\\\/03\\\/Logo-Mel\u00f8-65.png\",\"width\":261,\"height\":65,\"caption\":\"Advokatfirmaet Mel\u00f8 AS\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"},\"sameAs\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.facebook.com\\\/advokatmelo\\\/\",\"https:\\\/\\\/no.linkedin.com\\\/company\\\/advokatfirmaet-mel\"]},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melono.wpengine.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/351ddaec8ea5c2caca44f44a288d6693\",\"name\":\"Atle Mel\u00f8\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-GB\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b895ae22f2496fa71e8de295bbf19174f3bc710000ab66a336806333176b10e7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b895ae22f2496fa71e8de295bbf19174f3bc710000ab66a336806333176b10e7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/b895ae22f2496fa71e8de295bbf19174f3bc710000ab66a336806333176b10e7?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Atle Mel\u00f8\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/melo.no\\\/en\\\/juridisk-innsikt\\\/author\\\/atle\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Homebuyer had not lost the right to invoke defects","description":"H\u00f8yesterett kom til at det ikke var grunnlag for \u00e5 avskj\u00e6re mangelskrav av den grunn at kj\u00f8perne ikke hadde unders\u00f8kt boligen tilstrekkelig.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Atle Mel\u00f8","Estimated reading time":"3 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/"},"author":{"name":"Atle Mel\u00f8","@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#\/schema\/person\/351ddaec8ea5c2caca44f44a288d6693"},"headline":"Boligkj\u00f8per hadde ikke mistet adgangen til \u00e5 p\u00e5berope mangler","datePublished":"2025-10-22T08:52:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-22T08:53:07+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/"},"wordCount":1038,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/melo.no\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/eiendom-tinglysing-kartverket-hjemmelshaver-grunnbokshjemmel-nyhet.jpg","articleSection":["Fast eiendom"],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/","url":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/","name":"Homebuyer had not lost the right to invoke defects","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/melo.no\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/eiendom-tinglysing-kartverket-hjemmelshaver-grunnbokshjemmel-nyhet.jpg","datePublished":"2025-10-22T08:52:28+00:00","dateModified":"2025-10-22T08:53:07+00:00","description":"H\u00f8yesterett kom til at det ikke var grunnlag for \u00e5 avskj\u00e6re mangelskrav av den grunn at kj\u00f8perne ikke hadde unders\u00f8kt boligen tilstrekkelig.","breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-GB","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/melo.no\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/eiendom-tinglysing-kartverket-hjemmelshaver-grunnbokshjemmel-nyhet.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/melo.no\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/05\/eiendom-tinglysing-kartverket-hjemmelshaver-grunnbokshjemmel-nyhet.jpg","width":1000,"height":667,"caption":"Tinglysing av hjemmel"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/melo.no\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/boligkjoper-hadde-ikke-mistet-adgangen-til-a-paberope-mangler\/#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Hjem","item":"https:\/\/melo.no\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Fast eiendom","item":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/juridisk-innsikt\/fast-eiendom\/"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":3,"name":"Boligkj\u00f8per hadde ikke mistet adgangen til \u00e5 p\u00e5berope mangler"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/","name":"Advokatfirmaet Mel\u00f8 AS","description":"Trondheim","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-GB"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#organization","name":"Advokatfirmaet Mel\u00f8 AS","url":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/melo.no\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/Logo-Mel\u00f8-65.png","contentUrl":"https:\/\/melo.no\/wp-content\/uploads\/2019\/03\/Logo-Mel\u00f8-65.png","width":261,"height":65,"caption":"Advokatfirmaet Mel\u00f8 AS"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"},"sameAs":["https:\/\/www.facebook.com\/advokatmelo\/","https:\/\/no.linkedin.com\/company\/advokatfirmaet-mel"]},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/melono.wpengine.com\/#\/schema\/person\/351ddaec8ea5c2caca44f44a288d6693","name":"Atle Mel\u00f8","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-GB","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b895ae22f2496fa71e8de295bbf19174f3bc710000ab66a336806333176b10e7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b895ae22f2496fa71e8de295bbf19174f3bc710000ab66a336806333176b10e7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/b895ae22f2496fa71e8de295bbf19174f3bc710000ab66a336806333176b10e7?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Atle Mel\u00f8"},"url":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/juridisk-innsikt\/author\/atle\/"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17663","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/188"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=17663"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/17663\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/9715"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=17663"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=17663"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/melo.no\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=17663"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}